JWS Consulting is a division of Johnson Winter & Slattery providing commercial consulting services.
We are engaged by major Australian and international corporations as legal counsel on their business activities, disputes and most challenging matters.
Established in 1993 by Tony Johnson, Nigel Winter and Peter Slattery as a boutique corporate firm, JWS grew rapidly to become a leading independent Australian firm.
The quality of our legal advice and service to clients is recognised through independent industry recognition and direct client feedback.
Learn more about breaking news at Johnson Winter & Slattery, including major transaction announcements, practitioner appointments and team expansions.
JWS supports a number of community initiatives and not for profit organisations across Australia through pro bono legal work and charitable donations.
We are proud to sponsor a number of community initiatives.
Our mining experience extends from resource exploration, through production, processing, trading, haulage and shipping, to sale.
We have a deep understanding of the unique legal and commercial characteristics affecting the mining sector. We act for domestic and international clients on projects and operations in Australia and the region.
Our experience covers:
Michael Dulaney, James Marshall, Rick Malone, Peter Slattery and Peter Smith are recognised as leading lawyers in Natural Resources.
James Marshall is recognised as a leading lawyer in Mining.
Peter Rose is recognised as a Band 1 Energy & Natural Resources lawyer.
Johnson Winter & Slattery (JWS) is advising GFG Alliance on the addition of A$650 million in credit lines for working capital management and planned growth opportunities.
In the recent NSW Land and Environment Court decision of Gloucester Resources Limited v Minister for Planning  NSWLEC 9 Chief Judge Preston, in performing the role of the consent authority of...
The Bill that seeks to amend the Mining Act 1978 (WA) to remove uncertainty around the validity of mining tenements as a result of the High Court decision in Forrest & Forrest, was read in...