JWS Consulting is a division of Johnson Winter & Slattery providing commercial consulting services.
We are engaged by major Australian and international corporations as legal counsel on their business activities, disputes and most challenging matters.
Established in 1993 by Tony Johnson, Nigel Winter and Peter Slattery as a boutique corporate firm, JWS grew rapidly to become a leading independent Australian firm.
The quality of our legal advice and service to clients is recognised through independent industry recognition and direct client feedback.
Learn more about breaking news at Johnson Winter & Slattery, including major transaction announcements, practitioner appointments and team expansions.
JWS supports a number of community initiatives and not for profit organisations across Australia through pro bono legal work, charitable donations and sponsorships.
In 2018, we celebrated 25 years of long-lasting relationships with our valued clients.
The Federal Court has confirmed that there is no difference between liquidation and deed administration of a corporate trustee in relation to dealings with trust assets and the distribution of proceeds of those assets for the benefit of creditors.
Manpak operated as the trustee for the MP Unit Trust, which carried on the business of a product wholesaler. Under the Trust Deed, Manpak would be disqualified from holding office if it suffered an Event of Default, which included the appointment of an administrator.
Following the execution of a DOCA and the plaintiffs’ appointment as Deed Administrators, the plaintiffs sought to sell Manpak’s assets held in its own capacity and in its capacity as trustee. In doing so, the plaintiffs sought declaratory relief from the court regarding their proposed distribution of the sale proceeds.
Consistent with the principles set out in Killarnee and Amerind, the Court confirmed that the Deed Administrators of a trustee company are (like liquidators of corporate trustees) entitled to:
(a) realise the trust assets of the trust after obtaining the Court’s approval of any sale of those assets, given that a former trustee lacks a power of sale;
(b) distribute the resulting proceeds, including in payment of their remuneration and costs; and
(c) pay trust creditors, with priority creditors to be paid according to the waterfall provision set out in s 556 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
The Court also confirmed that any realisation of assets held by the company in its non-trustee capacity can only be paid to general (non-trust related) creditors.
The High Court is due to hear an appeal against the Amerind decision shortly. We will issue a further update once that decision has been delivered.
 Ross v Manpak Holdings Pty Ltd, in the matter of Manpak Holdings Pty Ltd  FCA 1548
 Killarnee Civil & Concrete Contractors Pty Ltd (ACN 085 230 486) (in liq)) v Matrix Partners Pty Ltd (2018) 354 ALR 436.
 Commonwealth v Byrnes & Hewitt (2018) 330 FLR 149.
Will your security interest expire on 30 January 2019?
The latest decision in the external administration of Mirabela is a reminder of the utility of the section 424 directions process for receivers, and an example of the steps to be taken in the face...
The Court of Appeal - Supreme Court of Western Australia has delivered a decision confirming that a statutory set-off under s 553C of the Corporations Act can still be available to a creditor...