JWS Consulting is a division of Johnson Winter & Slattery providing commercial consulting services.
We are engaged by major Australian and international corporations as legal counsel on their business activities, disputes and most challenging matters.
Established in 1993 by Tony Johnson, Nigel Winter and Peter Slattery as a boutique corporate firm, JWS grew rapidly to become a leading independent Australian firm.
The quality of our legal advice and service to clients is recognised through independent industry recognition and direct client feedback.
Learn more about breaking news at Johnson Winter & Slattery, including major transaction announcements, practitioner appointments and team expansions.
JWS supports a number of community initiatives and not for profit organisations across Australia through pro bono legal work, charitable donations and sponsorships.
In 2018, we celebrate 25 years of long-lasting relationships with our valued clients.
On 19 June 2018, the Federal Court of Australia ordered Apple Inc (Apple US) to pay penalties of $9 million for making false and misleading representations to customers about their rights under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). Whilst some misrepresentations were made on the Apple US website, most of the misrepresentations were made by Apple US’s Australian subsidiary, Apple Pty Ltd (Apple Australia).
The ACL contains a regime that implies certain warranties into supplies of goods or services which provide consumers with certain statutory remedies where these guarantees are not met. In respect of goods, one of the guarantees is that a good will be of an “acceptable quality” including by being free of faults and capable of doing all the things someone would normally expect them to do.
In the event that it becomes apparent that a good is not of “acceptable quality” within a reasonable time following purchase, and where the consumer notifies the supplier of that fault, the supplier is obliged to provide the remedies set out in the ACL (which include repair, replacement or refund depending on the extent of the fault).
Under the ACL, a person is prohibited from making false or misleading representations about the existence, exclusion or effect of the consumer guarantees and a breach of that prohibition will attract a maximum penalty of $1.1 million for companies or $220,000 for individuals.
Between February 2015 and February 2016, at least 275 owners of iPhones or iPads, following complaint of an error which disabled their device, were misinformed by Apple US (on its website) or by Apple Australia (by staff in store or on its customer service phone calls) that they were no longer eligible for a remedy if their device had been repaired by a third party. The Court held that this did not, and could not, result in the consumer guarantees ceasing to apply or extinguish the consumer’s right to a remedy.
If you are a global company that supplies goods and services to Australian consumers you need to comply with Australia’s presumptive consumer laws.
If not, then your parent company, whether it operates in Australian via an Australian subsidiary or not, may become liable for breaches of the ACL especially when your returns policies are not compliant with the ACL.
You should ensure that:
Class actions are set to become a prominent feature of the Australian employment law landscape.
Last month, the Full Federal Court ordered Japanese company Yazaki Corporation (Yazaki) to pay a penalty of $46 million for engaging in cartel conduct in contravention of the Competition and...
In May 2018, the Full Federal Court held that Pfizer did not misuse its market power under section 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Act) by engaging in a number of activities that...